Embracing Sustainability: Select First Signs the Anti-Greenwash Charter

Embracing Sustainability: Select First Signs the Anti-Greenwash Charter.

Date: 20th Nov 2023
Read time: 3 mins
Author: Charlie Martin

In an industry where sustainability has transitioned from a marginal to a central issue, Select First, under the guidance of Creative Director Tom Bourne, has taken a significant leap. This leap is their commitment to the Anti-Greenwash Charter, reflecting a deep-seated belief in authentic sustainability. Tom reflects on this evolution: “Probably less than 10 years ago, sustainability wasn’t really on the agenda for many brands, but over the last five or so years, it has become one of the biggest challenges they face.”

The Drive Towards Authenticity
The decision to join the Anti-Greenwash Charter stemmed from a critical observation of the industry’s tendencies towards superficial green claims. Tom notes the common industry practice:

“Manufacturers know they must talk about sustainability and green issues, so many seem to be looking for a ‘hook’ that makes them look good, at the compromise of honesty and transparency.”

Defining Genuine Sustainability
For Select First, the commitment to the Charter is more than a formality. It’s about setting a precedent in the industry. “Talking about sustainability is all about being honest,” says Tom, emphasising the need for clear, realistic sustainability targets and transparent communication.

Internal Transformation and Client Engagement
The Charter has not only reshaped Select First’s internal policies but also their approach to client engagement. Tom explains,

“Internally, as we’re a tight-knit agency, it has helped to formalise our approach and put everyone on the same hymn sheet.”

This internal cohesion is crucial in influencing clients and fostering broader industry change.

Educating for Integrity
A key aspect of Select First’s strategy is educating their workforce against greenwashing and in favour of genuine sustainability practices. Tom articulates this shared company sentiment: “We’re all more than aware and equally frustrated by its existence.”

Navigating Market Challenges
Maintaining transparent environmental claims in a competitive landscape is challenging, admits Tom. However, the Charter represents a commitment to overcome these hurdles. “It’s difficult and sometimes you feel compromised,” he concedes, but stresses the importance of honest communication.

Conveying a Message of Authenticity
By endorsing the Charter, Select First aims to showcase the importance of authenticity in sustainability to the industry and its clients. Tom hopes this move will inspire others to embrace genuine environmental practices and transparency. He states,

“I hope it sends a message that we’re serious about being authentic.”

A Standard for the Future
Select First’s adoption of the Anti-Greenwash Charter marks a significant step in their journey towards genuine sustainability and transparent communication. Tom’s insights underscore the importance of this commitment, setting a benchmark for not just Select First but the broader industry. This move is a clarion call for others to prioritise authenticity and transparency in their sustainability efforts.

If you think the Anti-Greenwash Charter embodies the values of your organisation, find out more here.

Contact Us​.

Queensgate House
48 Queen Street
Exeter
Devon
EX4 3SR

Supported By.

© 2023. The Anti-Greenwash Charter

Created with Gusto

Charlie Law of Timber Development UK (TDUK) explains why the organisation joined the Anti-Greenwash Charter.

Charlie Law of Timber Development UK (TDUK) explains why the organisation joined the Anti-Greenwash Charter.

Date: Nov 2023
Read time: 4 mins
Author: Charlotte Waters

Industry body TDUK aims to connect the timber supply chain “from sawmill to specifier, and all points in between”. Its other mission aims are to lead best practice, and accelerate a low-carbon future. We asked their Sustainability Director, Charlie Law, to explain more about that, and why joining the Anti-Greenwash Charter seemed like part of the solution.

Construction and climate change

The Government has set the UK ambitious net-zero targets. Nonprofit Architecture 2030 estimates that 42% of CO2 emissions globally come from construction and building operations, so the construction sector is under pressure to show it builds responsibly and creates efficient, low carbon structures.

This creates both opportunity and hazard. Sustainable approaches to construction should grow given these priorities. However, ill-thought-out communications can make even honest organisations look untrustworthy, especially since increases in scrutiny and precisely-defined regulation mean weak claims will be increasingly highlighted.

Timber has genuine sustainability advantages over traditional building materials (it stores carbon and is renewable, provided you plant to replace what you harvest). Messaging will backfire, however, if claims are not made honestly and carefully.

We became signatories of The Anti-Greenwash Charter to help shape guidance to our members in this area, and to formalise our own policies, so we could demonstrate best practice ourselves.

The importance of defining your terms

The heart of honest messaging is to define the terms you use, so that you and others have a basis for assessing whether they are true. The Anti-Greenwash Charter works with members to create a green claims policy that is consistent with wider standards, but also customised and useful for the new member and their stakeholders.

With their support, we created our own TDUK Green Claims Policy which has sections on our standards and practices, and the values we expect of members. The longest section, though, is a set of sustainability-related terms, each carefully defined. By committing to being a signatory, we have pledged to use language in accordance with these definitions, and are urging our members to do so too.

This glossary is a work in progress, incidentally. We may respond to government definitions, and have noted some areas that merit further investigation. In a changing world, refinement of these definitions may never come to a final close.

Pretending you’re perfect means you stop improving

Whatever materials and methods you use, erecting a building means preparing and transporting various products and then working with them over a programme. The embodied carbon within these products is attracting more attention as operational carbon emissions over the life of an asset are reduced.

We have seen that some construction products, and indeed projects, claim negative numbers for embodied carbon impact, suggesting that if only the governments of the world rushed to build more such structures, climate change would be reversed. Sadly, that would not work, as the production and delivery of all materials, including timber, have a carbon impact, however small.

The key reason for these  negative figures is the inclusion of sequestered biogenic carbon (i.e. the CO2 the tree has pulled out of the atmosphere during its growing cycle and locked away within the timber) in assessments, without acknowledging that this will be transferred at end-of-life to another product or to atmosphere. Older assessment standards did not require the whole lifecycle of the product to be considered. Likewise, some construction project assessments also only considered the Upfront Carbon impact.

However, it is now acknowledged that including sequestered biogenic carbon, without considering the end-of-life scenarios, is misleading. Therefore, the latest versions of standards such as EN 15804 and EN 15978 now require a Whole Life Carbon Assessment (WLCA) to be carried out. This requirement has also been included in the latest RICS Professional Standard on WLCA, however it does also acknowledge that Upfront Assessments are regularly carried out, in which case any biogenic carbon must be excluded from the assessment and stated separately to show the Stored Carbon benefit of the biobased elements. However, it also acknowledges that dynamic assessment (taking into account possible alternative end-of-life scenarios) may deliver alternative results that show an improved carbon balance due to the biogenic carbon content.

We therefore encourage all TDUK members to refrain from claiming their products or construction projects are Carbon Negative, Carbon Neutral, or Climate Positive (unless of course they can demonstrate this over the whole life of their product or project), and instead focus on the benefits of the product having a far lower carbon impact than like-for-like products in like-for-like applications and stored biogenic carbon overall.

We are leading by example here at Timber Development UK and urge all members who create case studies to maintain a careful separation of these figures. Our products generally have a much lower embodied carbon impact than other mainstream construction materials, without us having to resort to misleading claims.

Green claims should be made proudly where they are true and meaningful. Otherwise, we should refrain from making them.

If you think the Anti-Greenwash Charter embodies the values of your organisation, find out more here.

Contact Us​.

Queensgate House
48 Queen Street
Exeter
Devon
EX4 3SR

Supported By.

© 2023. The Anti-Greenwash Charter

Created with Gusto

Greenwash Webinar Feedback in Line With Research Findings

Greenwash Webinar Feedback in Line With Research Findings.

Date: Oct 2023
Read time: 2 mins
Author: Charlotte Waters

In our recent webinar with Futurebuild, we took the temperature of the audience on a number of topics to see how their experiences were reflected in the survey findings.

Investing in verified claims

The data says specifiers would pay more for a product with verifiable claims – how does that play out in reality?

  • 28% No, that’s not been the case in my experience
  • 59.5% On occasion, I’ve seen that to be the case
  • 12.5% Yes, I’ve often seen that to be the case

In this response, we can see that the data is backed up by people’s experiences. Specifiers are looking to include products that have verifiable claims. Whether those products stay on specification to the end is a question for a future poll!

Leaving greenwashing unchallenged

In the research, three-quarters said that there would be a loss of reputation ….. so we wanted to know, why aren’t we seeing more organisations doing more to stamp it out?

  • 8% Customers want products at whatever cost
  • 8% No commercial impact to being accused
  • 22% No legislative teeth
  • 62% No-one holding them to account

The majority believe that organisations will continue to greenwash until there is a robust method of holding them to account for the claims they are making. At The Anti-Greenwash Charter, we believe that a first step is in people creating a Green Claims Policy which shares how they make claims, and then being held to account for those by us as an independent body.

We aren’t looking to catch people out, but instead to encourage clarity around claims and then accountability in the face of a challenge. With too many conversations happening behind closed doors, it is hard to see how anything can improve.

Without universally accepted definitions of terms like ‘eco-friendly’ or ‘sustainable’, a Green Claims Policy is where you set out how you as an organisation define them. This offers clarity for customers and protection in the event of a challenge.

Getting clarity on definitions

Terminology is obviously an issue …. how could we reach universal definitions?

  • 11% Don’t know – it’s difficult to get universally agreed terminology
  • 19% Government-led definitions
  • 2% Not possible, we have to define it ourselves
  • 68% Sector-specific organisations to define for that industry

It’s clear that the audience felt that definitions have to be agreed within the sector rather than at a broader level. Which organisation would take responsibility for that is another follow-up question for future – would it be best from member organisations like RIBA or the Alliance for Sustainable Building Products, certification bodies like BRE or those focused on specific areas like The Sustainable Concrete Forum?

We’d love to hear your thoughts on these polls!?

Contact Us​.

Queensgate House
48 Queen Street
Exeter
Devon
EX4 3SR

Supported By.

© 2023. The Anti-Greenwash Charter

Created with Gusto

Greenwashing in the Built Environment – Unravelling Truths and Mitigating Risks

Greenwashing in the Built Environment – Unravelling Truths and Mitigating Risks.

Date: Oct 2023
Read time: 5 mins
Author: Charlotte Waters

In September 2023, we hosted a webinar with Futurebuild* at which we presented the findings of the recent research undertaken into the opinions of people in the built environment on greenwashing.

Greenwashing is clearly a topic that people want to know more about as over 1,000 people registered and, surprisingly for a webinar, around half turned up! Obviously the Futurebuild audience is an engaged one.

You can rewatch the presentation here but we’ll review the key points for anyone who would prefer to read it.

You can also view the polls that were taken in the webinar here.

The webinar was based around our recent survey report‘Greenwashing – what’s true, what’s not, and does it matter?’ – which includes data on how greenwashing impacts the industry reputationally and commercially, and how it stands in the way of achieving valid sustainability goals.

The survey, of 420 businesses, sheds light on green claims and key findings include:

  • Nearly 90% said that greenwashing is a problem.
  • 74% say it can lead to loss of reputation.
  • When asked what impression greenwashing can give, over 72% see it as dishonest and unethical.
  • 58% would remove a supplier from the supply chain if they are accused of or found guilty of greenwashing.
  • 72% would be prepared to pay a higher price for a product with verified green claims.

Introduction

The issue of greenwashing has gained significant attention in recent times, as sustainability and environmental concerns become increasingly critical for both consumers and businesses. In the survey, nearly 90% of respondents acknowledged greenwashing as a prevalent problem in various industries, with concerns about its dishonesty, unethical practices, and cost-driven motives.

This summary will delve into the survey’s findings, examining how greenwashing affects organisations across the built environment supply chain, its diverse manifestations, the impact of terminology, and why addressing it is crucial.

The Prevalence of Greenwashing

Greenwashing is pervasive in marketing materials and bid documentation, though to a lesser extent in the latter. It appears that companies tend to embellish their sustainability efforts to attract prospects, but these claims may not align with their actual practices.

Furthermore, visual elements such as imagery and colour choices often create misleading perceptions about an organization’s environmental commitments.

Half of the respondents reported encountering face-to-face encounters where they were presented with more positive information than could be verified, raising questions about trust and transparency.

Inconsistencies and Suspicious Phrases

The survey reveals that inconsistencies exist across different departments within organizations. Four in ten respondents reported hearing varying claims from different sources within the same organization. This may indicate poor communication governance or a lack of verified and defined sustainability claims.

Suspicious phrases like ‘offsetting,’ ‘environmentally friendly,’ ‘carbon neutral,’ and ‘sustainable practices’ were identified, casting doubt on their authenticity.

Without standardized definitions and publicly available explanations, the interpretation of such terms varies widely, highlighting the need for clarity in communication.

Why Greenwashing Matters

The consequences of greenwashing are far-reaching. It distracts from the goal of achieving net-zero emissions and securing a sustainable future for generations to come.

Customers need accurate information to make informed choices, supporting companies genuinely committed to positive change. Conversely, greenwashing erodes trust and hinders those genuinely striving for sustainability.

For businesses, it carries severe commercial implications, including damage to reputation, strained relationships, potential loss of business, and even financial penalties. A significant portion of respondents stated they would remove a supplier accused of greenwashing from their supply chain, emphasizing the importance of authenticity in business practices.

Verifying Claims

To protect themselves and provide truthful information, seven out of ten organizations are now more rigorous in requesting evidence to verify sustainability claims.

Nearly half of them seek a verified Green Claims Policy. If you don’t have one already, The Anti-Greenwash Charter can support you in creating one.

Clarity regarding verified claims and term definitions makes organisations more attractive to potential partners, as reported by nearly half of the respondents. While concerns about greenwashing haven’t substantially impacted the tendering process, the survey suggests that SMEs perform better in terms of claim accuracy compared to larger organizations.

Validating Sustainability Claims

To ensure robust claims, organisations are employing various approaches. These include referencing Environmental Product Definitions (50% of cases) and utilizing Lifecycle Assessments (46%). Additionally, many organizations have developed internal standards and processes for supply chain partners (nearly 4 in 10), or refer to the Product Environmental Footprint.

Some organisations employ independent sustainability consultants (25%) for added confidence, while others rely on BCorp certification (17%) to validate claims.

Notably, when asked if they would pay more for products with greater evidence of sustainability, nearly three-quarters of respondents expressed willingness to do so, indicating the growing importance of sustainability in purchasing decisions.

Greenhushing

Greenhushing, a term coined in response to greenwashing, emphasizes the importance of honesty and transparency.

Respondents stressed the need for organisations to acknowledge areas needing improvement, rather than claiming perfection. They recognised that immediate, substantial changes may not be feasible for most organizations and urged the celebration of smaller, genuine efforts and intentions for long-term sustainability.

This perspective encourages a shift away from solely applauding major changes that may not always represent the full picture.

Conclusion

The prevalence of greenwashing is a concerning issue that impacts organizations across various sectors, including the built environment.

Addressing this problem requires clear definitions of sustainability terms, transparent communication, and rigorous verification of claims. Businesses must recognize the far-reaching consequences of greenwashing, both in terms of reputation and commercial implications.

By fostering transparency and authenticity, organizations can build trust, support genuine sustainability efforts, and contribute to a more sustainable future.

* Futurebuild is an exhibition for the built environment which brings together more than 15,000 building industry influencers and decision-makers. It will take place from March 5th to March 7th London’s ExCeL. For more details and exhibitor inquiries, visit: https://www.futurebuild.co.uk

Contact Us​.

Queensgate House
48 Queen Street
Exeter
Devon
EX4 3SR

Supported By.

© 2023. The Anti-Greenwash Charter

Created with Gusto

Tools and Resources for Marketers

Free Tools & Resources for Built Environment Marketers.

Last Updated: January 2023

Influential Voices

Mark Ritson: Mark Ritson is a brand consultant and former marketing professor. He has a PhD in Marketing and taught on the MBA programmes of leading business schools including London Business School and MIT. He has written a column on marketing for almost 20 years, winning the PPA Business Columnist of the Year three times.

Rory Sutherland: Rory is vice chairman of Ogilvy UK and is an expert on consumer behaviour, trends and the influence of the internet. He analyses what branding means, what creativity is, and the value of persuasion over compulsion.

Dave Trott: Dave has worked as creative director for some of the world’s most effective advertising agencies and the author of the brilliant Creative Mischief; Predatory Thinking: A Masterclass in Out-thinking the Competition.

Writing

Capitalize My Title: Automatically capitalize your titles & email subjects. Use Title Case, AP, APA, Chicago, MLA style, UPPERCASE to lowercase, & more.

eBooks

The Curve by Nicholas Lovell: How do you make money when everything is going free?

Design

Coolors: The super fast color schemes generator + a collection of more than 800K palettes.

Removal: Instantly get transparent background image in almost no time. Fully automated and free.

Website Design

embedresponsively.com: helps build responsive embed codes for embedding rich third-party media into responsive web pages.

Microsoft Clarity: is a free analytics tool which provides website usage statistics, session recording, and heatmaps. Compared to Google Analytics (and other analytics platforms), it’s a little basic. But it’s robust, it’s easy to use, and it has some interesting features.

Octopus: create your website map or application structure, add notes, specify page content, and use color schemes to improve your site map design or implement website development or content planning.

Worth Of Web: find the website value, revenue, visits & pageviews estimates, Alexa Traffic Rank & charts, and Worth Of Web Rank for any website with this website value calculator.

UserTesting: a free tool that lets you see and hear a five-minute video of a real person using your website.

Chrome Extension

Keywords Everywhere: This Chrome extension provides useful google keyword search volume, cost-per-click information, and competitor data.

Grammarly: An online grammar checking, spell checking, and plagiarism detection platform.

Hunter: Immediately find the email addresses behind the websites you’re browsing.

Mailtrack: Free email tracking for Gmail.

LinkedIn Sales Navigator: Connect with email contacts on LinkedIn without leaving Gmail.

ColorZilla: Pick colour # codes straight from your webpage.

SEOquake: Check any webpage for a huge selection of SEO parameters.

Awesome Screenshot: Capture all or part of any web page. Add annotations, comments, blur sensitive info, and share with one-click uploads.

Image Downloader: Browse and download images on a web page

Screely: An online tool that instantly turns your screenshots and designs into beautiful design mockups.

Crystal Knows: The Crystal artificial intelligence platform uncovers the psychographic characteristics and conversational preferences of individuals. It uses a proven psychological test called DISC as its foundation. Then Crystal makes real-time recommendations on the words, phrases, styles, and tones you should use or avoid.

Photography

Stock Up: Best free stock photo websites in one place.

Pexels: Best free photos in one place.

All The Free Stock: Free stock images, icons, and videos.

Unsplash: Free (do whatever you want) high-resolution photos.

Splashbase: Search & discover free, hi res photos & videos.

Startup Stock Photos: Go. Make something.

Jay Mantri: Free pics. do anything (CC0). Make magic.

Travel Coffee Book: Sharing beautiful travel moments.

Designers Pics: Free photographs for your personal & commercial use.

Death to the Stock Photo: Free photos sent to you every month.

Foodie’s Feed: Free food pictures in hi-res.

Mazwai: Free creative commons HD video clips & footages.

Jéshoots: New modern free photos.

Super Famous: Photos by Dutch interaction designer Folkert Gorter.

Pixabay: Free high quality images.

Super Famous: Photos by Dutch interaction designer Folkert Gorter.

Picography: Free hi-resolution photos.

Pixabay: Free high quality images.

Magdeleine: A free high-resolution photo every day.

Snapographic: Free stock photos for personal & commercial use.

Little Visuals: 7 hi-res images in your inbox every 7 days.

Splitshire: Delicious free stock photos.

New Old Stock: Vintage photos from the public archives.

Picjumbo: Totally free photos.

Life of Pix: Free high-resolution photos.

Gratisography: Free high-resolution photos.

Getrefe: Free photos.

IM Free: A curated collection of free resources.

Cupcake: A photographer’s treat by Jonas Nilsson Lee.

The Pattern Library Free patterns for your projects.

Public Domain Archive: New 100% free stock photos.

ISO Republic: High-quality, free photos for creatives.

Stokpic: Totally free photos.

Kaboompics: The best way to get free photos.

Function: Free photo packs.

MMT: Free stock photos by Jeffrey Betts.

Paul Jarvis: Free high-resolution photos.

Lock & Stock Photos: Free stock photos for you.

Raumrot: Free high-resolution picture.

Bucketlistly: A free creative common collection of travel photos.

Typography

TypeGenius: Find the perfect font combo for your next project.

Font Squirrel: 100% free commercial fonts.

FontFaceNinja: Browser extension to find the web fonts a site uses.

Google Fonts: Free, open-source fonts optimized for the web.

Beautiful Web Type: Best typefaces from the Google web fonts directory.

DaFont: Archive of freely downloadable fonts.

1001 Free Fonts: A huge selection of free fonts.

FontPark: The web’s largest archive of free fonts.

Font-to-width: Fit pieces of text snugly within their containers.

Adobe Edge Fonts: The free, easy way to get started with web fonts.

Typekit: A limited collection of fonts to use on a website or in applications.

Image Optimisers

TinyJPG | TinyPNG: Compress images.

Compressor.io: Optimize and compress your images online.

Kraken: Optimize your images & accelerate your websites.

ImageOptimizer: Resize, compress and optimize your image files.

ImageOptim: Makes images take up less disk space & load faster.

Smush.it: Image optimizer WordPress plugin.

Dunnnk: Beautiful mockups.

InstaMockup: Create beautiful screenshots of your app or website.

SEO

Open Site Explorer: A comprehensive tool for link analysis.

Ahrefs: Site explorer & backlink checker.

Quick Sprout: Complete analysis of your website.

WordPress SEO by Yoast: Have a fully optimized WordPress site.

SEO Site Checkup: Check your website’s SEO problems for free.

Hubspot Marketing Grader: Grade your marketing.

SimilarWeb: A popular tool for getting data about web traffic and performance. The tool is really simple to use — you just enter a website URL and Similarweb gives you information about the site’s organic rankings, competitors, marketing channels, and more.

Alexa Ranking: Analytical insights to analyze any site’s rank.

SERPs Rank Checker: Free keyword rank & SERP checker.

OpenLinkProfiler: The freshest backlinks, for free.

Keywordtool.io: Free alternative to Google Keyword Planner.

Google: Analytics | Keyword Planner | Webmaster Tools | Trends |

Nibbler: Test any website.

Browseo: How search engines see your website.

Broken Links: Find broken links, redirects & more.

Copyscape: Search for copies of your page on the web.

Google Pagespeed Insights: Check the performance of your site.

Pingdom: Test & the load time of a site.

GTMetrics: Analyze your page’s speed performance.

Moz Local: Check your local listings on Google, Bing, and others.

XML Sitemaps: Sitemap generator that creates XML & HTML variants.

Shopify E-commerce Report: Get your free Ecommerce report.

W3C validator: Easy-to-use markup validation service.

Email Marketing

Good Sales Emails: Learn how some of the best companies are doing sales, by looking at their email campaigns.

Just Good Copy: Email copy from great companies

Contact Us​.

Queensgate House
48 Queen Street
Exeter
Devon
EX4 3SR

Supported By.

© 2023. The Anti-Greenwash Charter

Created with Gusto